Understanding Out of Jurisdiction Powers of Attorney in Real Estate Transactions
- Megan Ross
- Apr 1
- 4 min read
Note this article provides legal information, not legal advice. Reading this article should not be construed as obtaining legal advice from Ross Estate Law.
Insights from Jefferson v. Pillar to Post Home Inspections, 2016 NSSC 309
Purchasing a home is one of the biggest financial decisions most people make. However, it’s not always smooth sailing after the deal is done. In some cases, unforeseen issues such as asbestos discovery or faulty inspections can lead to disputes that may need legal intervention. The case we’re discussing highlights the complexities of settlement agreements, authority to enter into contracts, and the enforcement of such agreements. Here’s an overview of the case and what we can learn from it.
The Situation: A Dispute Over Asbestos and Home Inspections
In this case, a couple of home purchasers bought property from vendors only to later discover asbestos in the home. They filed a claim in Small Claims Court against multiple parties, including the home inspectors, the vendors, and the vendors' real estate agents. Unfortunately, their case was unsuccessful.
However, the purchasers agreed not to pursue an appeal against the real estate agents as long as the agents didn’t seek to collect costs from them. The agreement seemed to resolve the matter, but a key issue arose when the purchasers realized that the costs awarded did not include the legal fees they expected. As a result, they decided to proceed with the appeal against the real estate agents.
The Dispute: Enforcement of the Settlement Agreement
The real estate agents, on the other hand, were determined to enforce the settlement agreement that had been made with the purchasers. They filed a motion for the court to order enforcement of the settlement, arguing that the terms had already been agreed upon by the parties involved.
According to the agents, the agreement had been clearly communicated and accepted by one of the purchasers, J. The agents argued that, under the terms of the agreement, they were not to pursue costs, and the purchasers would not appeal the decision against them. In exchange, the agents would pay the purchasers $1, and the purchasers would sign a release.
The Court's Ruling: Validity of the Agreement and Authority to Settle
The court granted the agents' motion, enforcing the settlement agreement. The ruling was based on the fact that J, one of the purchasers, had communicated an unequivocal acceptance of the settlement agreement to the agents' counsel. The court found that J had the actual authority to enter into the agreement, and in any case, had the apparent authority to do so. This means that, even if J wasn’t specifically authorized by the other purchaser (H) to accept the settlement, his actions still bound both parties.
Additionally, the court considered the validity of the power of attorney that H had signed in favour of J. While H’s Missouri power of attorney appeared to meet the basic requirements of Nova Scotia law, it did not affect J's apparent authority to enter into the agreement. Therefore, the court concluded that the settlement agreement was valid.
Finally, the court addressed the issue of the signed release. Although the purchasers had only provided an email copy of the signed release, the court ruled that this did not affect the validity of the agreement. The original signed release was a condition for the settlement but was not a condition precedent for the agreement’s enforceability. The parties simply needed to work out the logistics of providing the original signed release.
Key Takeaways: The Importance of Clear Agreements and Authority
This case provides several important lessons for anyone involved in property disputes or settlement agreements:
Authority to Enter into Agreements: In legal disputes, it’s crucial to ensure that the individual entering into an agreement on behalf of another has the proper authority to do so. Whether it's actual or apparent authority, the validity of the agreement depends on whether the person acting has the legal power to make decisions.
Settlement Agreements: Even when an agreement seems informal or is reached via communication like email, it can be binding if both parties clearly understand and accept the terms. In this case, the court enforced a settlement based on an unequivocal acceptance of the terms, demonstrating that clear communication is key.
Power of Attorney: A power of attorney can be a valuable tool in real estate transactions, but it’s important to understand its validity in the jurisdiction where it's being used. Although H’s power of attorney was from Missouri, it met the basic requirements of Nova Scotia law and did not invalidate the settlement agreement.
Email Copies and Signed Releases: While providing an original signed release is important, the failure to do so right away does not necessarily invalidate the entire agreement. The court focused on the intent and terms of the agreement itself rather than minor technicalities.
Conclusion: Navigating Legal Disputes and Settlements
This case highlights the importance of understanding settlement agreements, authority to act, and the implications of powers of attorney in legal disputes. Whether you're buying a property or dealing with post-purchase issues like asbestos or home inspections, it's essential to work with legal professionals who can guide you through these complexities.
Please note that the information provided in this blog post is for general informational purposes only and is not intended as legal advice. Reading this post does not create an attorney-client relationship, and the information shared here should not be relied upon as a substitute for professional legal counsel. If you require personalized legal advice regarding estate planning or any related matters, we encourage you to schedule a consultation with Ross Estate Law to discuss your unique circumstances.
Comments